Monday 31 October 2011

the rise and rise of UGC

Is reality becoming more real? The rise and rise of UGC
Sara Mills explores the rise of the citizen journalist and considers the impact of user-generated content on news stories, the news agenda, and the role of the professionals.
Once, it was all quite simple…the big institutions created the news and broadcast it to a variously passive and receptive audience. Now new technologies mean that the audience are no longer passive receivers of news. The audience have become ‘users’ and the users have become publishers. Audiences now create their own content. We are in the era of user generated content (UGC) where the old divide between institution and audience is being eroded.

Key to this change has been the development of new technologies such as video phones and the growth of the internet and user-dominated sites. Both who makes the news and what makes the news have been radically altered by this growth of media technologies and the rise of the ‘citizen journalist’.
We first felt the effects of the new technologies way back in 1991. Video cameras had become more common and more people could afford them…unfortunately for four Los Angeles police officers! Having caught Rodney King, an African-American, after a high speed chase, the officers surrounded him, tasered him and beat him with clubs. The event was filmed by an onlooker from his apartment window. The home-video footage made prime-time news and became an international media sensation, and a focus for complaints about police racism towards African-Americans.
 Four officers were charged with assault and use of excessive force, but in 1992 they were acquitted of the charges. This acquittal, in the face of the video footage which clearly showed the beatings, sparked huge civil unrest. There were six days of riots, 53 people died, and around 4000 people were injured. The costs of the damage, looting and clear-up came in at up to a billion dollars. If George Holliday hadn’t been looking out of his apartment window and made a grab for his video camera at the time Rodney King was apprehended, none of this would have happened. King’s beating would be just another hidden incident with no consequences. The film footage can be still being viewed. Try looking on YouTube under ‘What started the LA riots.’ But be warned – it makes for very uncomfortable viewing, and even today, it is easy to see why this minute and half of blurry, poor-quality film had such a huge impact.

This was one of the first examples of the news being generated by ‘ordinary people,’ now commonly known as ‘citizen journalists’, ‘grassroots journalists’, or even ‘accidental journalists’. As technology improved over the years, incidents of this kind have become more and more common. Millions of people have constant access to filming capability through their mobiles, and footage can be uploaded and rapidly distributed on the internet. The power to make and break news has moved beyond the traditional news institutions.

It is not only in providing footage for the news that citizen journalists have come to the forefront. UGC now plays a huge role in many aspects of the media. Most news organisations include formats for participation: message boards, chat rooms, Q&A, polls, have your says, and blogs with comments enabled. Social media sites are also built around UGC as seen in the four biggest social networking sites: Bebo, MySpace, YouTube and Facebook. People also turn to UGC sites to access news: Wikipedia news, Google news and YouTube score highly in terms of where people go to get their news.
The natural disaster of the Asian Tsunami on December 26th 2004 was another turning point for UGC. Much of the early footage of events was provided from citizen journalists, or ‘accidental journalists,’ providing on-the-spot witness accounts of events as they unfolded. Tourists who would otherwise have been happily filming holiday moments were suddenly recording one of the worst natural disasters in recent times. In addition, in the days after the disaster, social networking sites provided witness accounts for a world-wide audience, helped survivors and family members get in touch and acted as a forum all those involved to share their experiences.

A second terrible event, the London bombings on July 5th 2005, provided another opportunity for citizen journalists to influence the mainstream news agenda. No one was closer to events than those caught up in the bombings, and the footage they provided from their mobile phones was raw and uncompromising. This first-hand view, rather than professionally shot footage from behind police lines, is often more hard-hitting and emotive. An audience used to relatively unmediated reality through the prevalence of reality TV can now see similarly unmediated footage on the news.

The desire for everyone to tell their own story and have their own moment of fame may explain the huge popularity of Facebook, MySpace and other such sites. It also had a more negative outcome in the package of writings, photos and video footage that 23-year-old Seung-Hui Cho, an undergraduate at Virginia Tech, mailed into NBC News. Between his first attack, when he shot two people, he sent the package from a local post office, before going on to kill a further 30 people. In his so-called ‘manifesto’ Cho showed his paranoia and obsession, likening himself to Jesus Christ. The reporting of the terrible events at Virginia Tech that day was also affected by citizen journalism, and the footage that student Jamal Albarghouti shot on his mobile phone video camera. Rather than concentrate on saving his own life, he recorded events from his position lying on the ground near the firing.
The footage, available on YouTube and CNN brought events home to a worldwide audience. We now expect passers by, witnesses, or even victims, to whip out their camera phones and record events, an instinct almost as powerful as that to save their own or others’ lives. Perhaps the news now seems old-fashioned and somehow staged if it lacks the raw, grainy low-quality footage provided by citizen journalists.

Twitter and flickr came to the forefront during the Mumbai bombings in India in late November 2008. As bombs exploded across the city, the world’s media got up-to date with events through reports on Twitter and Flickr. There were questions raised, however, that by broadcasting their tweets, people may have been putting their own and others’ lives at risk. It was on Twitter again that the story of the Hudson River plane crash on January 15th 2009 was broken to the world. With a dramatic picture of a plane half sinking in the river, and passengers crowded on the wing awaiting rescue Janis Krun tweeted:There’s a plane in the Hudson. I’m on the ferry going to pick up the people. Crazy.
The picture is still available on Twitpic, under ‘Janis Krun’s tweet.’ While national news organisations quickly swung into action, it was the citizen journalist, empowered by social networking sites, that first broke the story.
So who’s keeping the gate?
Are the gatekeepers still fulfilling their old function of deciding what is and isn’t news, and what will and won’t be broadcast? In some ways, yes. You can send in as much UGC to the major news organisations as you want, with no guarantee that any of it will ever be aired. In fact, last year a BBC spokesperson reported that a large proportion of photos sent in to the news unit were of kittens. While this may represent the interest of the audience, or users, it still doesn’t turn the fact that your kitten is really cute into ‘news.’ The way around the gatekeepers is with the independent media on the web. The blogosphere, for example, provides an opportunity for independent, often minority and niche views and news to reach a wide audience. In fact uniting disparate people in ‘micro-communities’ is one of the web’s greatest abilities. How else would all those ice fans communicate without the ‘Ice Chewers Bulletin Board?’ And the only place for those who like to see pictures of dogs in bee costumes is, of course, ‘Beedogs.com: the premier online repository for pictures of dogs in bee costumes.’On a more serious note, the change in the landscape of the news means that groups who had little access to self-representation before, such as youth groups, low income groups, and various minority groups may, through citizen journalism, begin to find that they too have a voice.
What about the professionals?
Do journalists fear for their jobs now everyone is producing content? It is likely that in future there will be fewer and fewer permanent trained staff at news organisations, leaving a smaller core staff who will manage and process UGC from citizen journalists, sometimes known as ‘crowd sourcing.’ Some believe that the mediators and moderators might eventually disappear too, leaving a world where the media is, finally, unmediated. This does raise concerns however. Without moderation sites could be overrun by bigots or fools, by those who shout loudest, and those who have little else to do but make posts The risk of being dominated by defamatory or racist or other hate-fuelled content raises questions about unmoderated content: ‘free speech’ is great as long as you agree with what everybody is saying!

If there will be fewer jobs for trained journalists, will there also be less profit for the big institutions? This seems unlikely. Although how to ‘monetarise’ UGC – how to make money for both the generator and the host of the content – is still being debated, bigger institutions have been buying up social networking sites for the last few years. Rather than launch their own challenge, they simply buy the site. Flickr is now owned by Yahoo!, YouTube was bought by Google, Microsoft invested in Facebook, and News Corp., owned by Murdoch, bought MySpace.There is a whole new world out there. With it comes new responsibility. There is enormous potential to expand our view of the world and our understanding of what is happening. Our collective knowledge, and wisdom, should grow. On the other hand, in twenty years time, the news could be overrun by pictures of people’s kittens and a few bigots shouting across message boards at each other.

  1. What is meant by the term ‘citizen journalist’?
Citizen journalist means that events that occurs has been filmed by ordinary people and has been used in the news and put on the internet
  1. What was one of the first examples of news being generated by ‘ordinary people’?
The first news being generated by ordinary people is Rodney King event a black male being batted by 4 police officers in 1991.
  1. List some of the formats for participation that are now offered by news organisations.
The formats for participation offered by the news are message boards, chat rooms, Q&A, polls and Blogs.
  1. What is one of the main differences between professionally shot footage and that taken first-hand (UGC)?
The main difference between professionally shot footage and taken first hand is that professional shot footage is edited and picked out some of the event scenes unlike first hand footage where it’s all filmed which makes it more realistic

  1. What is a gatekeeper?
A gatekeeper is that is in charge of the mainstream of media such as Murdoch is in charge of news Corp and most of the newspapers such as the sun
  1. How has the role of a gatekeeper changed?
The role of gatekeepers have changed as there are now citizen journalists that produce the news locally and spread it across the rest of the country
  1. What is one of the primary concerns held by journalists over the rise of UGC?
UGC provides the audience to be the producers and consumers therefore the internet will become much more risky as in what exactly to belief or what kind of information is actually accurate also known as ‘’crowd sourcing’’

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=omg1dsTWa3o

Monday 10 October 2011

''impact of new and digital media on news''

News corporation- Owned by Rupert Murdoch
Newspapers
·         The Sun
·         News of the World (ended publication 10 July 2011)
·         The Sunday Times
·         The Times
Broadcast
·         Sky
E-media
·         www.Foxsports.com
·         www.News.com

Commercial institution
·         ITV
·         ITV1
·         ITV2
Non-commercial institution
·         BBC

Monday 3 October 2011

AOL

Who owns AOL?
·         New York Stock Exchange (NYSE)
Does AOL own any traditional media business?
·         Little, Brown and Company Adult Trade Books 
·         Warner Books 
·         Little, Brown and Company Children's Publishing 
·         Bulfinch Press 
·         Warner Faith 
·         Time Warner Audio Books 
·         Time Warner Books UK 
What other internet sites does AOL own?
·         TechCrunch bought for $30 million
·         The Huffington Post bought for $315 million
·         Bebo
AOL revenue                                                                  
·         Down 17% to $551.4 million
How much is AOL worth?
·         $4.2 billion
Key facts about AOL
·         breaking news stories
·         Sports
·         Entertainment
·         Weather
·         provides timely and informative articles
·          picture galleries
·         in-depth video and engaging polls
·         benefits from live TV news broadcasting provided by BBC News, BBC Parliament, ITN News, Al Jazeera, Euronews and France 24







3 quotes referred to AOL

·         ‘’AOL said that quarterly revenue from online display advertising grew 4 percent after more than three years of declines’’
·         ‘’In 2011, it announced plans to lay off 1,000. The cuts, representing 20 percent of AOL’s work force, also included reductions in its operations in India’’
·         ‘’AOL is losing 19,000 paying customers a week. Many of those who remain are either stuck in the habit of paying, do not need a faster connection or live beyond the reach of broadband’’
AOL is
·         An American global Internet services and media company
·         1983 as Control Video Corporation (CVC), 1991 as America Online, Vienna, Virginia, U.S, 2006 as AOL
·         AOL into a separated with Time Warner and became a public company on December 9, 2009
·         on December 20, 2005  Google purchased a 5% share of AOL for $1 billion
·         AOL was rated both one of the best and worst Internet suppliers in the UK, according to a poll by BBC Watchdog
·         AOL included online games in its mix of products; many classic and casual games were included in the original Play Net software system
  • Graphical chat environments Habitat (1986–1988) and Club Caribe (1988) from LucasArts.
  • The first online interactive fiction series QuantumLink Serial by Tracy Reed (1988).
  • Quantum Space, the first fully automated Play by email game (1989–1991).
  • The original Dungeons & Dragons title Never winter Nights from Stormfront Studios (1991–1997), the first Massively Multiplayer Online Role Playing Game (MMORPG) to depict the adventure with graphics instead of text (1991).
  • The first chat room-based text role-playing game Black Bayou (1996–2004), a horror role-playing game from Hecklers Online and Antagonist, Inc
http://www.aol.co.uk/
  • AOL offers the latest breaking news, gossip, sports, business and stock quotes on the web. Get free email, AIM access, viral videos, horoscopes and more!